Logistic regression in case‐control studies: The effect of using independent as dependent variables

Nico J.D. Nagelkerke, Stephen Moses, Francis A. Plummer, Robert C. Brunham, David Fish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In case‐control studies, cases are sampled separately from controls. In such studies the primary analysis concerns the estimation of the effect of covariables on being a case or a control. To explore causal pathways, further secondary analysis could concern the relationships among the covariables. In this paper the validity of such secondary analysis is addressed. In particular, the use of multiple logistic regression in case‐control studies where the dependent variable is not the case/control indicator is explored. It is shown that only under very restrictive conditions will sample regression coefficients correctly estimate their true value. In many situations, it may be valid to regress one covariable on others in the control group, but not in the case group or the combined sample. This principle is illustrated by a study of sexually transmitted disease in Kenya.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-775
Number of pages7
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 30 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Logistic regression in case‐control studies: The effect of using independent as dependent variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this