Evaluating Organizational Hypocrisy within Universities as Toxic Leadership Behavior

Abdulfattah Yaghi, Majed Yaghi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As academic managers, college deans, associate deans, assistant deans, department chairs, and program coordinators play pivotal leadership roles within universities. It is, therefore, crucial to understand their organizational behavior. Without ascribing causal values to conduct, this study hypothesizes that academic managers repeatedly practice workplace hypocrisy. To test this postulation, the study seeks to identify the characteristics of perceived hypocrisy before exploring the possible similarities between hypocritical behavior and toxic leadership behavior. The data were obtained via open-ended questions answered by 175 academic managers and 517 professors working in 13 universities. The results of the analyses support the initial hypothesis: 81% of all respondents reported experiencing more than one hypocritical incident in the last year; 84% of the academic managers and 64% of the professors testified to being directly affected by first-hand hypocrisy. The responses revealed four groups of hypocritical characteristics; dishonesty, attacking others, disregard to institutional wellbeing, and disingenuous personality. Similarities between hypocritical and toxic characteristics were discussed followed by theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-400
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Integrity
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • associate deans
  • deans
  • ethics
  • higher education
  • hypocrisy
  • leadership
  • provost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Public Administration
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Organizational Hypocrisy within Universities as Toxic Leadership Behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this