Episodic envy and counterproductive work behaviors: Is more justice always good?

Abdul Karim Khan, Samina Quratulain, Chris M. Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined how perceived event-specific procedural and distributive justice about own and envied others' outcomes interacts with episodic envy to predict counterproductive work behaviors. Our results were consistent with the attribution model of justice, finding that episodic envy significantly predicted counterproductive work behaviors aimed at envied others in the workplace and that this relationship was more pronounced when perceptions of procedural, but not distributive, justice about own or envied others' outcomes were high rather than low. We tested a moderated-mediation model in which self-attributions for the outcome mediated the effect of episodic envy on counterproductive work behaviors and that the effect of envy was stronger when perceptions of own or others' procedural justice were high rather than low. This research contributes to the literature on envy processes in the workplace and is the first to use a specific emotion, envy, as a proxy for a negative outcome in a demonstration of the attribution model of justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-144
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attribution model of justice
  • Counterproductive work behaviors
  • Distributive justice
  • Envy
  • Procedural justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Episodic envy and counterproductive work behaviors: Is more justice always good?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this